To mitigate these loss of control accidents the NTSB recommends stall awareness and recovery training, good aeronautical decision making, maintaining situational awareness, and that pilots seek training and currency in the aircraft flown. The NTSB also recommends angle of attack (AOA) indicators as a tool to help pilots identify stall situations. With the exception of the AOA devices all of these solutions rely on individual pilots to pay attention and keep their skills sharp. There isn’t much more that GA pilots can do beyond committing themselves to staying proficient and maintaining vigilance in the air.
The second NTSB most wanted issue is to strengthen procedural compliance in commercial aviation. The crux of this issue is that if pilots have good procedures, are trained to use them, and then follow those procedures every time, then safety will be increased. Procedural compliance is a significant safety issue, but the accidents the NTSB references have significant failures on the part of the pilots beyond merely disregarding procedures. Lack of situational awareness and poor flying skills seem to be a bigger concern than the fact that a procedure was disregarded. In the San Francisco crash mentioned in the NTSB article the pilots failed to stay on top of the automation and did not recognize dangerously slow airspeeds. In the Birmingham, Alabama crash the pilots did not adhere to their minimum descent altitude during a non-precision approach. These are complacent crews. They did neglect procedures, but I feel the bigger problem was that the pilots simply did not have their heads in the game.
The NTSB recommends better procedures, more training, and a safety culture. Implementing these changes will certainly make a safe system even safer, but it feels like the NTSB is nit-picking in an effort to try and make even an inch of safety gains. I think that more time hand flying the aircraft, and perhaps an extra day in the simulator during recurrent training to cover extra topics, might be better solutions to the issue the NTSB is trying to resolve.
References:
ASN Aircraft accident
Boeing 777-28EER HL7742 San Francisco International Airport, CA (SFO). (n.d.).
Retrieved February 8, 2015, from
http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20130706-0
Fact Sheet – General
Aviation Safety. (n.d.). Retrieved February 8, 2015, from
http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=16774
General Aviation
Accidents in 2011. (n.d.). Retrieved February 8, 2015, from
http://www.aopa.org/-/media/Files/AOPA/Home/Pilot Resources/Safety &
Proficiency/Accident Analysis/Nall Report/Nall_23_R4.pdf
NTSB Points To Unstable
Approach in UPS A300 Crash. (n.d.). Retrieved February 8, 2015, from
http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/2014-10-01/ntsb-points-unstable-approach-ups-a300-crash
Pappas, S. (2015,
February 5). Why Private Planes Are Nearly as Deadly as Cars. Retrieved
February 8, 2015, from
http://www.livescience.com/49701-private-planes-safety.html
Prevent Loss of Control
in Flight in General Aviation. (n.d.). Retrieved February 8, 2015, from
http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/mwl/Pages/mwl7_2015.aspx
Strengthen Procedural Compliance. (n.d.). Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/mwl/Pages/mwl10_2015.aspx
I completely agree with you when you say, "There isn’t much more that GA pilots can do beyond committing themselves to staying proficient and maintaining vigilance in the air." I also would add to that that other than adding training regulations, there really isn't much more the NTSB or FAA can do, except hope that pilots take more personal initiative and responsibility.
ReplyDeletePointing out that the NTSB nit-picks for their recommendations was a good observation, even though that's technically what they're around for. There's only so much the FAA, NTSB, and the airlines can do to make sure their pilots maintain proficiency. More time in the simulator should definitely help most pilots remain proficient, and it's mostly on the airlines to make sure their pilots build practice time in the simulators.
ReplyDeleteSome people in the aviation industry may disagree with NTSB highlighting general aviation loss-of-control accidents on the most wanted list because they claim "the NTSB is sustaining the focus on an issue that has been at the forefront of safety efforts by AOPA, the aviation industry, and the FAA for some time" (Tennyson, 2013). I agree that there are many efforts constantly operating to continue to create a safe environment in the aviation industry and that it has been an objective improving for many years. Even though these issues are nothing new in aviation, they will always have a need for review of training to implement prevention and compliance.
ReplyDeleteIt is up to the GA pilots to make sure they are proficient and go the extra mile. This all boils down to professionalism. Even though these pilots do not fly for this career they need to bring the same level of professionalism that a commercial pilots brings to the table. This is not a hobby like golf or fishing where you can go out on a nice day a few times a year and expect to be a safe pilot it needs practice and lots of it.
ReplyDeleteI would hazard a guess that Congress gets enough campaign funding from the GA community that I sincerely doubt the FAA will be allowed to tighten the rules on general aviation.
ReplyDelete